Among these smart door locks with fingerprint keypads, I’d choose the Wyze Auto-Lock Bolt v2 as the best overall for its listed fingerprint entry, Wi-Fi, and backup keys. The Philips WiFi Keypad Door Lock with Handle stands out for buyers who want fingerprint access alongside app and voice control, while the TEEHO TE002 is a simpler deadbolt-focused alternative. The main tradeoffs are whether you need a deadbolt or knob/handle set, how much remote access matters, and whether the product’s listed features match your door and preferred setup. Fingerprint convenience is useful, but it should not outweigh fit, backup access, and connectivity limits. Read on for the full comparison and guidance on choosing the right lock for your entryway.
Get privacy and security gear delivered free with Prime
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
- Member-only deals all year
Key Takeaways
Wyze Auto-Lock Bolt v2 leads on a balanced feature mix: its listing combines fingerprint access, Wi-Fi, keyless entry, and backup keys, addressing several common access needs in one deadbolt-style option.
Philips options split by configuration: the WiFi keypad deadbolt with handle and the Wi-Fi model listing voice and fingerprint access suit shoppers prioritizing connected features, while buyers should confirm the exact model’s fingerprint support before ordering.
Deadbolts and fingerprint knobs serve different jobs: the TEEHO TE002 and Ulecoce U68 are deadbolt-oriented picks, while several biometric knob listings focus on bedrooms, offices, or other interior doors.
Many handle-set listings overlap on basic access methods: the Yamiry, GHome, Veise, and other keypad-and-fingerprint options need closer comparison of app, connectivity, and backup-access details rather than feature-count claims alone.
Product titles do not settle fit or reliability questions: door measurements, handing, battery and emergency-access details, and network requirements still need confirmation in the product specifications before choosing.
| Smart Door Handle Lock with Keypad and Fingerprint, Yamiry Front Door Lock |  | Best for Flexible Entry Options | Brand: Yamiry | Model: YR01 | Lock type: Smart deadbolt lock | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Philips WiFi Keypad Deadbolt with Handle, Built-in WiFi, APP Remote Control |  | Best for Direct WiFi Control | Model: DDL242X-1HW-L | Connectivity: Built-in 2.4GHz WiFi | Access methods: Fingerprint, keypad, app, and voice commands | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| TEEHO TE002 Fingerprint Deadbolt with Keypad for Front Door, Matte Black |  | Best for Standalone Front-Door Access | Model: TE002 | Access methods: Fingerprint, passcode, physical key, and one-time PIN | Fingerprint storage: Up to 20 fingerprints | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Fingerprint Door Lock Biometric Door Knob with Keypad Keyless Entry for Bedrooms, Home, Hotel, Office, Apartment – Black |  | Best for Indoor Rooms and Shared Spaces | Brand and model: Evanshow 190NOA | Access methods: Fingerprint, password, mechanical key, and IC card | Fingerprint capacity: Up to 100 fingerprints | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Keypad Smart Door Knob Lock with Fingerprint and Keyless Entry |  | Best for Bluetooth App Access | Model: YR05 | Access methods: Fingerprint, password, app, key fob, and physical key | Connectivity: Bluetooth | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Smart Fingerprint Door Lock with Keypad and Multiple Entry Methods |  | Best for Flexible Access Options | Unlock methods: Fingerprint, keypad, password, key, app | Fingerprint capacity: 50 | Password capacity: 100 | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Philips Wi-Fi Smart Deadbolt Lock, Keyless Entry Door Lock for Front Door |  | Best for Built-In Wi-Fi Access | Brand: PHILIPS | Model number: DDL242X-1HW | Unlock methods: App, passcode, fingerprint, physical key, voice control | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Fingerprint Door Lock – Smart Door Handle with Keypad, Biometric Door Knob for Bedroom, Home Office |  | Best for Bedrooms and Home Offices | Brand: DREMUSOUD | Model: E008 | Recommended uses: Home, office, bedroom | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Philips WiFi Keypad Door Lock with Handle, Built-in WiFi, APP Remote Control, Voice & Fingerprint Unlock, Satin Nickel |  | Best for a Wi-Fi Handle Set | Connectivity: Wi-Fi, 2.4 GHz | Unlock methods: Fingerprint, PIN codes, app, voice | Fingerprint speed: 0.3 seconds | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Fingerprint Smart Door Lock with Handle & Keypad – Keyless Entry, Remote Access, Alexa & Google Compatible |  | Best for Rental Hosts and Shared Households | Brand: Sifely | Model: Sifely S | Material and finish: Zinc; satin nickel | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Ulecoce U68 Fingerprint Keypad Deadbolt with Knob Set, Matte Black |  | Best for High-Capacity Fingerprint Access | Fingerprint storage: 512 sets | Unlock methods: Fingerprint, keypad, app, physical keys | Auto-lock timer: 5–60 seconds | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Keypad Smart Door Lock with Handle – Fingerprint Keyless Entry Digital Lock for Front Door – Matte Black |  | Best for All-in-One Entry Options | Material: Aluminum alloy | Color: Matte black | Dimensions: 5.7 × 2.7 × 3 inches | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| GHome Smart Fingerprint Door Lock, 4-in-1 Keyless Entry with App Control and Auto Lock |  | Best for Smaller Households | Unlock methods: Fingerprint, keypad password, app control, mechanical key | Fingerprint capacity: 20 | Password capacity: 20 | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Veise VE017 Fingerprint Smart Door Lock with App Control, Matte Black |  | Best for Shared-Access Management | Material: All-zinc alloy, scratch-resistant | Finish: Matte black | Battery life: At least 12 months | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Wyze Auto-Lock Bolt v2 Fingerprint Smart Lock with Wi-Fi, Keyless Entry, and Backup Keys |  | Best for Built-In Wi-Fi Convenience | Model: WLCKB2 | Unlock methods: Fingerprint, Wi-Fi app, keypad, backup keys | User capacity: Up to 50 keypad codes or fingerprints | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| smart door locks with fingerprint keypad | Unlock methods |
|---|---|
| Smart Door Handle Lock with Ke | — |
| Philips WiFi Keypad Deadbolt w | — |
| TEEHO TE002 Fingerprint Deadbo | — |
| Fingerprint Door Lock Biometri | — |
| Keypad Smart Door Knob Lock wi | — |
| Smart Fingerprint Door Lock wi | Fingerprint, keypad, password, key, app |
| Philips Wi-Fi Smart Deadbolt L | App, passcode, fingerprint, physical key, voice control |
| Fingerprint Door Lock | Fingerprint, password, IC card, app, mechanical key |
| Philips WiFi Keypad Door Lock | Fingerprint, PIN codes, app, voice |
| Fingerprint Smart Door Lock wi | Fingerprint, passcode, fob, app, physical key |
| Ulecoce U68 Fingerprint Keypad | Fingerprint, keypad, app, physical keys |
| Keypad Smart Door Lock with Ha | — |
| GHome Smart Fingerprint Door L | Fingerprint, keypad password, app control, mechanical key |
| Veise VE017 Fingerprint Smart | Fingerprint, app, keypad, key fob, mechanical key |
| Wyze Auto-Lock Bolt v2 Fingerp | Fingerprint, Wi-Fi app, keypad, backup keys |
More Details on Our Top Picks
Smart Door Handle Lock with Keypad and Fingerprint, Yamiry Front Door Lock
The Yamiry YR01 is a strong fit for households that want more than fingerprint and keypad entry: it also supports an app, key fobs, mechanical keys, and Alexa voice commands. That range gives family members and visitors different ways to get in, while activity tracking and remote access management can help landlords keep tabs on access. Compared with the TEEHO TE002, which emphasizes local fingerprint and PIN access with a long stated battery life, Yamiry leans more heavily on connected features. The tradeoff is that remote control and Alexa unlocking require a separate WiFi gateway, and app-dependent functions rely on connectivity. Its reversible handle and adjustable latch add installation flexibility, but buyers who want a straightforward standalone fingerprint deadbolt may prefer TEEHO.
Pros:- Offers fingerprint, passcode, app, key fob, and mechanical-key access.
- App supports remote access management and activity tracking.
- Reversible handle and adjustable latch suit different door orientations.
- Alexa voice control is available when paired with a WiFi gateway.
Cons:- Remote control and Alexa unlocking require a separate WiFi gateway.
- Some functions depend on the app and an internet connection.
- The product details do not specify battery life or fingerprint capacity.
Best for: Landlords and households that want fingerprint access alongside key fobs, app-based access management, and optional voice control.
Not ideal for: Buyers seeking remote or Alexa control without purchasing a separate WiFi gateway, or those who prefer a simpler lock with fewer app-dependent features.
- Brand:Yamiry
- Model:YR01
- Lock type:Smart deadbolt lock
- Access methods:Fingerprint, app, passcode, key fob, mechanical key, and Alexa voice commands
- Included keys and fobs:2 mechanical keys and 2 key fobs
- Included hardware:Exterior assembly, interior assembly, screw set, and adjustable latch
- Recommended use:Indoor and outdoor doors
Our verdict“Choose the Yamiry YR01 if your household values several entry methods and app-managed access, and you are willing to add a gateway for remote features.”
Philips WiFi Keypad Deadbolt with Handle, Built-in WiFi, APP Remote Control
The Philips 4200 Series is the clearest choice here for buyers who want app-based remote control without a separate gateway: it connects directly to 2.4GHz WiFi. Its keypad and fingerprint reader offer quick local entry, while customizable auto-lock can reduce the chance of leaving the door unsecured. Compared with the Yamiry YR01, Philips removes the added gateway requirement for remote access, but Yamiry lists more access methods, including key fobs. Philips states a fingerprint unlock time of 0.3 seconds and battery life of up to six months, though batteries are not included. Fit needs attention too: the lock is designed primarily for right-opening doors and specified door thicknesses, so it is less adaptable than a reversible-handle option.
Pros:- Built-in 2.4GHz WiFi enables app-based remote control without a separate gateway.
- Combines fingerprint and keypad entry with voice assistant compatibility.
- Customizable auto-lock delay ranges from 0 to 180 seconds.
- Specified fingerprint unlock time is 0.3 seconds, with battery life up to six months.
Cons:- Standard alkaline batteries are required but not included.
- Auto-lock must be enabled manually in the app.
- Designed primarily for right-opening doors and a limited door-thickness range.
Best for: Homeowners who want fingerprint and keypad entry plus direct app control over 2.4GHz WiFi, and whose door matches the stated fit requirements.
Not ideal for: Buyers with left-opening doors, doors outside the specified thickness range, or those who want included batteries and more varied access options such as key fobs.
- Model:DDL242X-1HW-L
- Connectivity:Built-in 2.4GHz WiFi
- Access methods:Fingerprint, keypad, app, and voice commands
- Auto-lock:Yes; customizable from 0 to 180 seconds
- Fingerprint unlock time:0.3 seconds
- Battery life:Up to 6 months
- Battery type:Standard 1.5V alkaline batteries; not included
- Supported door thickness:1-3/8 to 1-3/4 inches (38 to 50 mm)
Our verdict“Pick the Philips 4200 if direct WiFi app control matters more than key-fob access and your door fits its orientation and thickness requirements.”
TEEHO TE002 Fingerprint Deadbolt with Keypad for Front Door, Matte Black
The TEEHO TE002 is a practical pick for buyers who want a fingerprint keypad deadbolt without making app control the center of the setup. It stores up to 20 fingerprints and 20 passcodes, and one-time PINs give guests temporary access without sharing a regular code. Its stated battery life of up to 365 days is a useful contrast with the Philips 4200 Series, which lists up to six months but adds direct WiFi remote control. TEEHO instead focuses on local entry, physical-key backup, and auto-lock timing from 10 to 99 seconds. The limits are meaningful: it takes four AA batteries, the door must have the specified 2-1/8-inch hole, and setup may take more effort than buyers expect. Its IP54 rating also makes it better suited to exposed residential use than indoor-only knobs.
Pros:- Stores up to 20 fingerprints and 20 passcodes.
- One-time PINs provide a separate access option for guests.
- IP54 weather resistance and BHMA Grade 3 certification are specified.
- Auto-lock timing can be set from 10 to 99 seconds.
Cons:- Requires four AA batteries, which are not included.
- Installation is limited to doors with a 2-1/8-inch hole.
- Setup may feel complex for buyers seeking a quick, minimal configuration.
Best for: Homeowners who want a front-door fingerprint deadbolt with one-time guest PINs, physical-key backup, and no listed dependence on app connectivity.
Not ideal for: People who need app-based remote access, have a nonstandard door bore, or want to avoid replacing four AA batteries.
- Model:TE002
- Access methods:Fingerprint, passcode, physical key, and one-time PIN
- Fingerprint storage:Up to 20 fingerprints
- Passcode storage:Up to 20 passcodes
- Auto-lock timing:10 to 99 seconds
- Battery:4 AA batteries; not included
- Material and certification:Aluminum alloy; BHMA Grade 3
- Weather resistance:IP54
- Door-hole compatibility:2-1/8 inches (54 mm)
Our verdict“Choose the TEEHO TE002 for local fingerprint, PIN, and guest-code access on a compatible front door, but skip it if remote app control is a priority.”
Fingerprint Door Lock Biometric Door Knob with Keypad Keyless Entry for Bedrooms, Home, Hotel, Office, Apartment – Black
This Evanshow biometric knob is aimed at interior doors where a compact fingerprint-and-keypad entry system matters more than weather protection or connected access. It supports up to 100 fingerprints and 50 passwords, giving it far more stated credential capacity than the TEEHO TE002’s 20 fingerprints and 20 passcodes. IC cards and mechanical keys add alternatives for shared rooms, offices, or apartments. Installation is described as requiring no drilling or wiring, and the reversible handle suits different hand orientations. That indoor focus is also its main limitation: unlike the TEEHO TE002, this model is explicitly not intended for outdoor use. Battery-life details are absent, so buyers cannot readily plan replacement intervals from the supplied specifications. It also requires an administrator fingerprint to be registered before normal use.
Pros:- Supports up to 100 fingerprints and 50 passwords.
- IC cards and mechanical keys add access choices beyond biometrics and passwords.
- Installation is described as requiring no drilling or wiring.
- Reversible hand orientation and support for a range of wooden-door thicknesses help with interior-door fit.
Cons:- Specified for indoor use, not outdoor exposure.
- Battery-life information is not provided.
- Administrator fingerprint registration is required before use.
Best for: Households, small offices, and apartment residents who need high fingerprint and password capacity for an indoor wooden door.
Not ideal for: Anyone shopping for an exterior front-door lock, app-based remote access, or clearly specified battery-life expectations.
- Brand and model:Evanshow 190NOA
- Access methods:Fingerprint, password, mechanical key, and IC card
- Fingerprint capacity:Up to 100 fingerprints
- Password capacity:Up to 50 passwords
- Supported door thickness:1.18 to 1.97 inches
- Use:Indoor
- Handle:Reversible metal pull handle
- Finish:Matte black
Our verdict“Choose the Evanshow for a busy indoor room or shared space where credential capacity matters more than outdoor durability or remote app access.”
Keypad Smart Door Knob Lock with Fingerprint and Keyless Entry
This YR05 suits buyers who want a fingerprint keypad knob with phone-based Bluetooth control and several backup entry methods. It adds key fobs and physical keys to fingerprint and password access, making it more flexible at the door than the indoor-focused Evanshow, which instead offers high stated fingerprint and password capacity. The YR05 is listed for front, back, internal, and external doors and has a weather-resistant construction, while its aluminum body gives it a more substantial feel than a basic indoor knob. The main distinction is connectivity: the listed protocol is Bluetooth, and remote control requires a separately sold WiFi gateway. That makes it less direct for remote access than the built-in-WiFi Philips 4200 Series. Buyers should also weigh app setup and the fact that physical keys can be duplicated.
Pros:- Combines fingerprint, password, app, key fob, and physical-key access.
- Bluetooth app control is available, with remote control possible through a separate WiFi gateway.
- Listed for front, back, internal, and external doors, with weather resistance.
- Aluminum construction and included latch and mounting hardware support a complete door-knob installation.
Cons:- A separate WiFi gateway is required for remote control.
- Smartphone app setup is part of the access experience.
- Physical keys can be duplicated, and battery-life details are not specified.
Best for: Homeowners who want fingerprint and keypad entry with Bluetooth app control, key fobs, and mechanical-key backup across several door locations.
Not ideal for: Buyers who need remote access out of the box, want to avoid app setup, or prefer not to rely on duplicable physical keys as a backup.
- Model:YR05
- Access methods:Fingerprint, password, app, key fob, and physical key
- Connectivity:Bluetooth
- Remote access:Requires a separately sold WiFi gateway
- Material:Aluminum
- Dimensions:5.62 x 2.69 x 3 inches
- Weight:1.18 kg
- Weather resistance:Yes
- Included components:Front plate, back plate, hardware, user guide, latch, physical keys, and key fobs
Our verdict“Pick the YR05 if you want several entry methods and Bluetooth app control in a weather-resistant knob, but choose a built-in-WiFi option for remote access without an extra gateway.”
Smart Fingerprint Door Lock with Keypad and Multiple Entry Methods
This lock is a good fit for households or small offices that want several ways to get inside without relying on one person’s phone. It combines fingerprint, keypad, password, key, and app access, with room for 50 fingerprints and 100 passwords. That capacity gives it more scope for rotating visitors or staff than the bedroom-focused DREMUSOUD E008. Its stated one-second recognition and aluminum-alloy body add practical appeal, while compatibility with 35–55 mm doors covers a useful range of thicknesses.
The main compromise is connectivity: remote access needs a separately purchased gateway, so the app alone does not provide the same out-of-box remote control as the Philips Wi-Fi models. Four AAA batteries are also not included, and actual battery life depends on use. I’d choose it for varied local access methods, not for buyers who want remote management without extra hardware.
Pros:- Five listed access methods include fingerprint, keypad, password, key, and app
- Capacity for 50 fingerprints and 100 passwords suits shared access
- Aluminum-alloy construction and compatibility with 35–55 mm doors
- Includes two physical keys for backup access
Cons:- Remote access requires a separate gateway
- Four AAA batteries and the gateway are sold separately
- Battery life is listed as 6–12 months and may vary with usage
Best for: Families, shared homes, and small offices that need many fingerprint and password slots plus key backup.
Not ideal for: Buyers who want remote unlocking immediately without buying a separate gateway, or who prefer a lock with specified built-in Wi-Fi.
- Unlock methods:Fingerprint, keypad, password, key, app
- Fingerprint capacity:50
- Password capacity:100
- Recognition speed:1 second
- Door thickness compatibility:35–55 mm
- Material:Aluminum alloy
- Power:4 AAA batteries, not included
- Battery life:6–12 months
- Keys included:2
Our verdict“Choose this model if you need flexible access for multiple users and can accept buying a gateway for remote control.”
Philips Wi-Fi Smart Deadbolt Lock, Keyless Entry Door Lock for Front Door
The Philips Wi-Fi Smart Deadbolt is the clearest choice here for buyers who want remote app access without a separate hub. Fingerprint, passcode, physical key, app, and Alexa or Google Assistant control give household members several entry routes, while customizable codes and real-time notifications help owners manage access from afar. Compared with the gateway-dependent Smart Fingerprint Door Lock with Keypad and Multiple Entry Methods, the Philips is more straightforward for remote control because Wi-Fi is built in.
That convenience depends on a 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi network, and the product data does not specify fingerprint capacity, battery life, or door-thickness range. It also lacks a door sensor, so app monitoring should not be mistaken for direct confirmation of door position. I’d pick it over the handle-equipped Philips DDL242X-1HW when deadbolt form and hub-free remote access matter more than a specified handle set.
Pros:- Built-in Wi-Fi supports remote access without an extra hub
- Combines fingerprint, passcode, app, physical key, and voice control
- Customizable access codes and real-time notifications support remote management
Cons:- Works only with 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi
- No door sensor for detecting door position
- Batteries are not included, and battery type and life are not specified in the provided data
Best for: Homeowners who want fingerprint and passcode entry with remote app access and voice control, without adding a hub.
Not ideal for: Buyers whose network is 5 GHz-only or who need a door sensor or clearly stated fit and battery specifications before choosing.
- Brand:PHILIPS
- Model number:DDL242X-1HW
- Unlock methods:App, passcode, fingerprint, physical key, voice control
- Connectivity:Built-in Wi-Fi; 2.4 GHz networks only
- Voice assistants:Alexa and Google Assistant
- Access management:Customizable passcodes and real-time notifications
- Included components:1 door lock
Our verdict“Pick this deadbolt if hub-free remote access and voice control matter more to you than a door sensor or detailed fit specifications.”
Fingerprint Door Lock – Smart Door Handle with Keypad, Biometric Door Knob for Bedroom, Home Office
The DREMUSOUD E008 is the most purpose-specific pick in this group: it is a fingerprint handle for bedrooms and home offices, rather than a front-door deadbolt built around remote management. Its five access methods—fingerprint, password, IC card, app, and mechanical key—give household members and occasional users alternatives to a biometric scan. The listed 0.2-second recognition is faster on paper than the one-second figure for the Smart Fingerprint Door Lock with Keypad and Multiple Entry Methods, though recognition speed alone does not establish overall reliability.
It is designed for standard US doors from 1-3/8 to 2-1/8 inches thick and installs without drilling, making it more approachable for an interior door than the Wi-Fi deadbolts. The tradeoff is narrower fit and less emphasis on remote access: full control requires the app, and the data does not describe built-in Wi-Fi or remote functionality. Skip it if you need a front-entry deadbolt with specified remote monitoring.
Pros:- Five entry methods include fingerprint, password, IC card, app, and mechanical key
- Listed recognition speed is 0.2 seconds
- DIY installation is described as requiring no drilling
- Includes two IC cards and has a 12-month warranty
Cons:- Fit is limited to standard US doors 1-3/8 to 2-1/8 inches thick
- Four AAA batteries are not included
- Full control requires a smartphone app, with remote connectivity details not specified
Best for: Renters and homeowners adding fingerprint access to a standard-size bedroom, office, or other interior door.
Not ideal for: Buyers seeking a front-door deadbolt, broad door-size compatibility, or clearly specified remote access without app dependence.
- Brand:DREMUSOUD
- Model:E008
- Recommended uses:Home, office, bedroom
- Unlock methods:Fingerprint, password, IC card, app, mechanical key
- Recognition speed:0.2 seconds
- Door thickness compatibility:1-3/8 to 2-1/8 inches
- Power:4 AAA batteries, not included
- Included accessories:Key and 2 IC cards
- Warranty:12 months
Our verdict“Choose the E008 for a standard-size bedroom or office door where fast fingerprint entry and simple installation matter more than deadbolt-style remote features.”
Philips WiFi Keypad Door Lock with Handle, Built-in WiFi, APP Remote Control, Voice & Fingerprint Unlock, Satin Nickel
This Philips pairs a fingerprint keypad lock with a handle set, which makes it a more complete fit for buyers replacing a handle-equipped entry setup rather than a deadbolt alone. Built-in 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi enables app control and access monitoring without the separate gateway required by the Smart Fingerprint Door Lock with Keypad and Multiple Entry Methods. Fingerprint, PIN, and voice control add convenient alternatives, while the 0–180-second auto-lock setting lets owners choose how quickly the door relocks after entry.
Its 0.3-second fingerprint speed is a listed advantage over the one-second figure on that multi-method lock, but the Philips requires eight AA batteries, which are not included. Fit is limited to doors 1-3/8 to 1-3/4 inches thick, so checking the door before purchase matters. Compared with the Philips DDL242X-1HW deadbolt, this model’s included handle set is the key distinction; buyers who only need a deadbolt may not need the extra hardware.
Pros:- Includes a handle set alongside fingerprint and PIN entry
- Built-in 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi supports app control and access monitoring
- Voice control works with Alexa and Google Assistant
- Auto-lock delay can be set from 0 to 180 seconds
Cons:- Eight AA batteries are not included
- Door thickness compatibility is limited to 1-3/8 to 1-3/4 inches
- Remote features depend on a stable 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi connection
Best for: Homeowners replacing a compatible handle-equipped entry lock who want built-in Wi-Fi, fingerprint entry, and configurable auto-lock.
Not ideal for: Buyers with doors outside the 1-3/8 to 1-3/4-inch range, unstable 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi, or a preference for a deadbolt-only setup.
- Connectivity:Wi-Fi, 2.4 GHz
- Unlock methods:Fingerprint, PIN codes, app, voice
- Fingerprint speed:0.3 seconds
- Voice assistants:Alexa and Google Assistant
- Auto-lock:Yes; adjustable from 0 to 180 seconds
- Handle set:Included
- Door thickness compatibility:1-3/8 to 1-3/4 inches (38–50 mm)
- Batteries:8 AA alkaline batteries, not included
Our verdict“Choose this Philips if you need a compatible handle-set replacement with built-in Wi-Fi, rather than a deadbolt-only lock.”
Fingerprint Smart Door Lock with Handle & Keypad – Keyless Entry, Remote Access, Alexa & Google Compatible
The Sifely S suits buyers managing a changing mix of residents, guests, or short-term renters. Its access options span fingerprint, passcode, fob, app, and physical key, and the back-lit keypad with anti-peeping password support is useful when people enter after dark or when someone may be watching the code. Compared with the Philips WiFi Keypad Door Lock with Handle, it offers fob access and includes two key cards, but remote unlocking is less self-contained: it needs an optional Wi-Fi Gateway.
The lock supports Bluetooth and Wi-Fi, auto-lock, one-touch locking, and a reversible handle, with DIY installation for most standard doors. Those options make it adaptable, though the supplied information does not specify fingerprint capacity, door-thickness range, or battery requirements. I’d choose it for access flexibility and guest management, not if dependable remote control without extra hardware is the priority.
Pros:- Supports fingerprint, passcode, fob, app, and physical-key entry
- Back-lit keypad includes anti-peeping password functionality
- Auto-lock and one-touch locking provide different ways to secure the door
- Reversible handle and DIY installation suit many standard doors
Cons:- Remote unlocking from anywhere requires a separately purchased Wi-Fi Gateway
- The provided specifications do not state fingerprint capacity or door-thickness range
- Battery type and battery life are not specified in the provided product data
Best for: Airbnb hosts and shared households that need several local entry methods, guest codes, and the option to add remote access.
Not ideal for: Buyers who need remote unlocking out of the box or want clear door-fit and battery specifications before purchasing.
- Brand:Sifely
- Model:Sifely S
- Material and finish:Zinc; satin nickel
- Unlock methods:Fingerprint, passcode, fob, app, physical key
- Connectivity:Bluetooth and Wi-Fi
- Additional lock features:Auto-lock, one-touch lock, back-lit keypad, anti-peeping password
- Included access items:2 keys and 2 key cards
- Installation:DIY; reversible handle; fits most standard doors
- Remote access:Requires optional Wi-Fi Gateway
Our verdict“Pick the Sifely S for flexible guest and household access if you are comfortable adding a gateway for remote unlocking.”
Ulecoce U68 Fingerprint Keypad Deadbolt with Knob Set, Matte Black
The Ulecoce U68 stands out for households that want many people to enter by fingerprint: its 512 fingerprint slots far exceed the GHome lock’s 20. Its listed 0.3-second recognition also favors quick entry, while keypad, app, and physical-key access provide alternatives when a scan is inconvenient. The included knobs and mounting hardware make this a more complete deadbolt-and-knob set than options that focus on a single lock unit. I would weigh that capacity against the missing battery-life estimate, which makes upkeep harder to plan. Remote access and Alexa or Google Assistant control also depend on a separate gateway. This is a better match than the GHome for large households or shared access, but less straightforward for buyers who want predictable battery details or gateway-free voice features.
Pros:- Stores up to 512 fingerprints, well beyond the GHome’s 20-user capacity.
- Listed 0.3-second fingerprint response supports quick everyday entry.
- Fingerprint, keypad, app, and physical-key access give users multiple fallback methods.
- Includes two knobs, backup keys, and mounting hardware.
Cons:- Battery life is not specified, making maintenance planning uncertain.
- Voice control requires a separately purchased gateway.
- Some connected functions may call for extra accessories.
Best for: Large households or shared homes that need fingerprint access for many users and want a deadbolt with matching knobs.
Not ideal for: Buyers who want a stated battery-life estimate or voice control without purchasing a separate gateway.
- Fingerprint storage:512 sets
- Unlock methods:Fingerprint, keypad, app, physical keys
- Auto-lock timer:5–60 seconds
- App compatibility:iOS and Android
- Voice control:Alexa and Google Assistant with gateway
- Finish:Matte black
- Included components:Two knobs, backup keys, mounting hardware
- Warranty:3 years
Our verdict“Choose the Ulecoce U68 if fingerprint capacity matters more than a published battery estimate or gateway-free voice control.”
Keypad Smart Door Lock with Handle – Fingerprint Keyless Entry Digital Lock for Front Door – Matte Black
This handle-style lock suits buyers who want more than fingerprint and keypad entry: it also lists app, remote, voice, and key-fob access. Its aluminum-alloy construction and IP65 weather-resistance claim make it a stronger fit for exposed doors than the Wyze Bolt v2, which is rated IP53. The listed battery life of up to 12 months gives shoppers a planning point that the Ulecoce U68 does not provide. There are tradeoffs: remote control requires a separately purchased gateway, and the supplied data does not specify fingerprint capacity or recognition speed. The app setup may also take more effort than buyers seeking a simple keypad-and-fingerprint lock. I’d pick this over the Veise if the handle format and weather rating lead the decision, but not for clear biometric capacity data.
Pros:- Combines fingerprint, passcode, key, app, and key-fob access.
- IP65 weather-resistance claim is higher than the Wyze Bolt v2’s IP53 rating.
- Lists up to 12 months of battery life with four AA batteries.
- Aluminum-alloy body and compatibility with most U.S. doors support a practical retrofit.
Cons:- Remote control requires a separately purchased gateway.
- Fingerprint capacity and recognition speed are not specified.
- App setup may be complex for buyers who want a simpler configuration.
Best for: Homeowners seeking a handle-style lock with several entry methods and a stated battery-life estimate for an exterior door.
Not ideal for: Buyers who need a published fingerprint-user limit, quick recognition specification, or remote access without extra hardware.
- Material:Aluminum alloy
- Color:Matte black
- Dimensions:5.7 × 2.7 × 3 inches
- Battery life:Up to 12 months with four AA batteries
- Control methods:App, remote, touch, voice
- Unlock options:Fingerprint, passcode, key, app, key fob
- Weather resistance:IP65
- Style:Modern
Our verdict“Pick this handle-style option for broad entry-method choice and its IP65 claim, provided you accept gateway-dependent remote access.”
GHome Smart Fingerprint Door Lock, 4-in-1 Keyless Entry with App Control and Auto Lock
The GHome is a focused choice for a household that needs a few dependable biometric users rather than a large roster: it stores 20 fingerprints and 20 passwords. That is far less than the Ulecoce U68’s 512-fingerprint capacity, but the GHome gives clearer battery expectations, with a rechargeable battery rated for 10,000 unlocks or 300-plus days. Local fingerprint storage is a useful privacy distinction for buyers who prefer biometric data kept on the lock. It also supports keypad, app, and mechanical-key entry, so a scan is not the only way in. The tradeoff is its 1.5-second recognition specification and periodic charging; the Wyze Bolt v2 lists faster sub-half-second unlocking and Wi-Fi, while this GHome is better suited to modest user counts and a more defined battery estimate.
Pros:- Stores fingerprints locally, supporting a privacy-conscious setup.
- Provides capacity for 20 fingerprints and 20 passwords.
- Battery is rated for 10,000 unlocks or 300-plus days.
- Fits doors from 1⅜ to 2¼ inches thick and offers four entry methods.
Cons:- Fingerprint capacity is limited compared with the Ulecoce U68.
- The listed 1.5-second recognition time is slower than the Wyze Bolt v2’s sub-0.5-second claim.
- Rechargeable battery needs periodic charging.
Best for: Couples, small families, or home-office users who want local fingerprint storage and a defined battery-use estimate.
Not ideal for: Large households or shared properties needing fingerprint access for more than 20 users, or buyers who prefer replaceable AA batteries.
- Unlock methods:Fingerprint, keypad password, app control, mechanical key
- Fingerprint capacity:20
- Password capacity:20
- Recognition speed:1.5 seconds
- Battery:400 mAh rechargeable
- Battery life:10,000 unlocks or 300+ days
- Material and finish:Aluminum, polished silver
- Compatible door thickness:1⅜–2¼ inches
Our verdict“Choose the GHome for a smaller user group that values local fingerprint storage and a stated rechargeable-battery rating.”
Veise VE017 Fingerprint Smart Door Lock with App Control, Matte Black
The Veise VE017 is the most management-oriented pick here. Its customizable access codes, activity logs, and alerts make it a natural fit for landlords or households that need to track changing access, while the GHome is more appealing for a smaller group with simpler needs. The VE017 adds key-fob and mechanical-key options alongside fingerprint and keypad entry, and its local encrypted storage keeps the stated biometric storage approach clear. A claimed battery life of at least 12 months also compares favorably with the Wyze Bolt v2’s up-to-eight-month estimate. The main catch is connectivity: Wi-Fi remote access needs the separately sold G1 Gateway. Batteries are not included, and smart-home features can add setup work, so this is less compelling for buyers who want a ready-to-use, gateway-free lock.
Pros:- Activity logs, alerts, and customizable codes support shared-access oversight.
- Local encrypted storage is specified for fingerprint data.
- Supports fingerprint, keypad, key fob, app, and mechanical-key entry.
- Listed battery life of at least 12 months exceeds the Wyze Bolt v2’s up-to-eight-month estimate.
Cons:- Remote Wi-Fi access requires a separately sold Veise G1 Gateway.
- Four AA/LR6 batteries are not included.
- Some connected and smart-home features may require extra setup or compatible devices.
Best for: Landlords, multi-tenant households, or families who need access codes, activity records, and alerts to manage entry.
Not ideal for: Buyers who want remote access without a separate gateway, included batteries, or the least involved setup.
- Material:All-zinc alloy, scratch-resistant
- Finish:Matte black
- Battery life:At least 12 months
- Batteries:Four AA/LR6 alkaline batteries, not included
- Connectivity:Wi-Fi via Veise G1 Gateway, sold separately
- Security standard:BHMA/ANSI certified
- Unlock methods:Fingerprint, app, keypad, key fob, mechanical key
- Access-management features:Customizable codes, activity logs, alerts
Our verdict“Choose the Veise VE017 when access records and flexible code management matter more than gateway-free remote control.”
Wyze Auto-Lock Bolt v2 Fingerprint Smart Lock with Wi-Fi, Keyless Entry, and Backup Keys
The Wyze Bolt v2 is the clearest pick for buyers who want Wi-Fi app control without a separately listed gateway. That gives it an advantage over the gateway-dependent Veise VE017 and Ulecoce U68 for remote management. Its fingerprint scanner is specified to unlock in under 0.5 seconds and adapt over time, while support for up to 50 fingerprints or keypad codes suits a family or small shared home. Compared with the GHome, it offers more listed user slots and faster claimed recognition, but its battery estimate is shorter at up to eight months. The IP53 rating also indicates weather resistance, not full waterproofing, so a highly exposed entry may favor the other handle lock’s IP65 claim. Eight AA batteries and USB-C emergency power add flexibility, though regular battery replacement remains part of ownership.
Pros:- Wi-Fi connectivity supports app-based remote management without a separate gateway listed.
- Fingerprint unlocking is specified at under 0.5 seconds and adapts over time.
- Supports up to 50 keypad codes or fingerprints.
- Includes backup keys, eight AA batteries, and USB-C emergency power.
Cons:- Up-to-eight-month battery life is shorter than the Veise VE017’s stated 12-month minimum.
- IP53 weather resistance is not a fully waterproof rating and falls below the other handle lock’s IP65 claim.
- Remote app control depends on a working Wi-Fi connection.
Best for: Homeowners who want direct Wi-Fi app access, fast fingerprint entry, and capacity for up to 50 users.
Not ideal for: Buyers with a highly exposed door needing a higher stated weather-resistance rating or those seeking longer listed battery life.
- Model:WLCKB2
- Unlock methods:Fingerprint, Wi-Fi app, keypad, backup keys
- User capacity:Up to 50 keypad codes or fingerprints
- Fingerprint recognition:Under 0.5 seconds; adapts over time
- Connectivity:Wi-Fi
- Battery life:Up to 8 months
- Power:Eight AA batteries; USB-C emergency power
- Weather resistance and durability:IP53; BHMA2
Our verdict“Pick the Wyze Bolt v2 for built-in Wi-Fi and quick, adaptable fingerprint entry, but choose a higher weather-rated lock for a more exposed door.”
How We Picked
I compared the 15 listings by the information they provide about fingerprint access, keypad entry, lock format, connectivity, and backup methods. I gave more weight to options whose described feature mix can serve more than one practical need—such as local entry plus remote control or a physical key—than to listings with broad feature claims but little detail. I also separated deadbolts from knobs and handle sets, since they are not interchangeable for every door or household.
The order reflects how clearly each option appears to balance everyday usability with useful access alternatives, not a claim of hands-on testing or verified performance. Listings with app, Wi-Fi, or voice features can rank well for connected-home buyers, but those additions do not automatically make a lock a better fit. Product details vary, so I treat unlisted items—such as precise compatibility, network bands, and backup-power methods—as points to verify rather than assumed strengths.
Factors to Consider When Choosing Smart Door Locks With Fingerprint Keypad
Before choosing a fingerprint lock, I’d work through the door, access, and connectivity questions in that order. Doing so helps avoid a common mistake: choosing a feature-rich lock that does not fit the door or the way the household actually enters.
Choose the Lock Format Before Comparing Features
Start by deciding whether you need a deadbolt, a knob, or a handle set; these formats solve different installation and security needs. A deadbolt is generally a separate locking mechanism, while a knob lock may suit an interior door or a door whose existing hardware matches the product. A combined handle set can change the look and feel of the entry, but it may require more careful checks against existing holes and spacing. Measure door thickness, backset, borehole, and the distance between hardware openings using the manufacturer’s requirements. Do not assume that a listing labeled “front door” fits every front door. If the lock format is wrong, app features and fingerprint options will not make the installation workable.
Check Fingerprint Access Against Household Use
Fingerprint entry is most useful when the people who use the door can register and manage their own prints without relying on a shared code. Ask how many fingerprints and users the lock supports, whether temporary access can be removed, and what happens when a print does not read. Those details affect households with children, visitors, caregivers, or users whose fingerprints may be difficult for a sensor to recognize. Keep a keypad code, key, or other supported entry method available rather than treating biometrics as infallible. For shared rentals or short-term access, straightforward code management may matter more than adding another biometric feature. Compare the access-management details in the full specification, not just the phrase “fingerprint unlock.”
Decide Whether Remote Access Is Worth the Extra Setup
Bluetooth, built-in Wi-Fi, and hub-dependent connectivity offer different levels of control. Local fingerprint or keypad entry can work without remote access, while checking status or managing access away from home depends on the lock’s app and network arrangement. Built-in Wi-Fi may reduce the need for a separate bridge, but it can add setup and network requirements; confirm those before buying. Voice-assistant compatibility is useful only if the exact lock and required services support the actions you want. If you mainly need convenient entry at the door, a simpler model may be easier to manage. Choose connected features for a clear use, such as remote access management, rather than assuming every smart function will be available out of the box.
Plan for Power Loss and Lockouts
A smart lock still needs a fallback plan when batteries run down, a keypad malfunctions, or a fingerprint is not recognized. Check whether the specific model has a physical key, an emergency power connection, or another documented backup route. Also look for battery-life guidance and low-battery alerts in the product information; do not infer either from the word “smart.” Households with children, older adults, or frequent guests may benefit from more than one backup method. Decide who can access the backup key and where it will be kept without leaving it exposed near the door. A lock with several entry methods can be more forgiving, but only when those methods are clearly described and practical for your household.
Match Security Expectations to the Lock’s Actual Job
Fingerprint convenience is not a substitute for understanding the door’s full security setup. A lock’s fit, installation, door condition, strike plate, and frame all affect how well the entry resists forced opening. Check the manufacturer’s stated security information and installation requirements, and avoid treating app control or biometric access as proof of stronger physical protection. For a primary exterior door, compare deadbolt options with knob-only products carefully; a knob may not serve the same role as a deadbolt. Consider whether the lock will be used on an interior room, office, apartment entry, or main exterior door, since the right format and backup plan can differ. Spend time on the door and frame as well as the lock itself.
Compare the Full Ownership Tradeoff, Not Just the Feature List
More features can mean more setup, more app permissions, and more details to maintain. Before choosing, check how user codes and fingerprints are added or deleted, whether remote features require an account or subscription, and what ongoing battery replacement involves. A simpler keypad deadbolt may suit someone who wants dependable local access, while a connected model makes more sense for a household that will use remote management. Confirm which items are included and whether installation calls for tools or existing hardware changes. Avoid choosing by the longest feature list: prioritize the two or three functions you will use regularly. This keeps the lock easier to maintain and reduces the chance of paying attention to features that do not solve your access needs.
Frequently Asked Questions
Should I choose a fingerprint deadbolt or a fingerprint door knob?
I’d start with the job the lock must do, not the fingerprint feature. A deadbolt is a separate locking mechanism and is often the more relevant format for a primary exterior entry, while a knob lock may better suit an interior room or a door already set up for that hardware. A handle set can involve additional spacing and installation checks. Measure the door and compare the product’s required dimensions before deciding. The listings in this roundup include both deadbolt-focused choices and biometric knobs, so they should not be treated as direct substitutes.
Do I need Wi-Fi if the lock already has fingerprint and keypad entry?
No, Wi-Fi is not required for fingerprint or keypad entry if those methods work locally on the lock. Wi-Fi can add remote status checks or access management, depending on the model and app, but it also brings network and setup requirements. If you only need to unlock the door while standing at it, a connected model may add little value. Check whether Wi-Fi is built in or requires a separate bridge, and confirm the supported network setup. The Philips and Wyze listings highlight connected features, while a simpler keypad deadbolt may suit buyers who prefer fewer dependencies.
What backup access should I look for if fingerprint recognition fails?
Look for a fallback you can actually use, such as a keypad code or physical key, and check whether the specific model documents an emergency power option. A second entry method helps when a print is not recognized, but it does not solve every issue if the lock has lost power or the app is unavailable. Confirm how backup access works before installation rather than waiting for a lockout. Keep any physical key accessible to a trusted person without storing it in an obvious spot near the door. Among these listings, backup methods differ, so compare the model details instead of assuming they all include the same safeguards.
Can I install one of these locks on an apartment door?
Possibly, but check both the physical fit and your building’s rules first. Apartment doors can have specific hardware, door-thickness, and installation constraints, and some landlords or building managers do not permit changes to exterior locks. Compare the lock’s stated measurements with your door and existing boreholes, and find out whether installation leaves the original hardware intact. Also consider what happens when you move out and whether the lock can be removed cleanly. A biometric knob listed for apartments may still be unsuitable for a particular entry, so the product label alone is not enough to confirm fit.
How should I choose between a simple keypad lock and a model with app or voice features?
Choose based on whether remote control is a regular need. A keypad-and-fingerprint lock with local entry can be easier to set up and may be all a household needs for everyday access. App or voice features can help with remote access management or smart-home routines, but they depend on compatible services and may add setup steps. Verify which functions work locally and which rely on an app, Wi-Fi, or another device. If you do not expect to use remote control, a less connected option can be a more straightforward fit.
Conclusion
For a balanced mix of access methods, I’d start with the Wyze Auto-Lock Bolt v2 as the best overall pick, particularly for buyers who want fingerprint entry, Wi-Fi, and backup keys in one listing. The TEEHO TE002 is my best value-style choice for shoppers who prefer a more focused deadbolt option, while the Philips WiFi Keypad Door Lock with Handle is the best premium-style fit for buyers prioritizing connected access and a handle configuration. For beginners, I’d favor a simpler keypad-and-fingerprint model with clearly documented backup entry and fewer connectivity steps. For bedroom or office doors, compare the biometric knob options, including the Fingerprint Door Lock Biometric Door Knob listings, rather than defaulting to a front-door deadbolt. Before ordering any of them, confirm door measurements, the exact fingerprint and app features, and the backup method that matters most to your household.
Halloween Picks
halloween
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
